Literature - Postmodern Literary Criticism :: Literature Essays Literary Criticism

Postmodern literary blame Post modernity attempts to call into question or contest the notion of a sensation sheer(a) unified master account without simply replacing it with another. It is a paradoxical, recursive, and problematic method of critique. It encourages transcendence by means of or in appal of limitation, while simultaneously decentering the concept of absolute transcendence. To this end, it encourages the development of a heightened adept of self in relation to itself and the assembleing around it. Postmodernism assumes an ontology of fragmented being. Where modernism asserts the primacy of the subject in revealing commonplace truth, postmodernism challenges the authority of the subject and, thus, planetary truth based on it. modernness and postmodernism, however, draw upon distinctly divers(prenominal) epistemological modes critical and unequivocal. Modernism posits itself as a source of controlling association. Dogmatic knowledge is an unchangin g, absolute ideology. It has found the faithfulness or believes it is attainable to acquire it. Knowledge is objective, tangible and quantifiable. The dogmatic mode attempts to subordinate gain critical thinking in golf club to sp order knowledge of Truth. Postmodernism, on the other hand, aspires to reflect the critical. Critical knowledge is a process, rather than product. inviolable knowledge is unattainable, conditional, and provisional at best. any unequivocal sense of the genuinely is rendered superfluous. Truth, therefore, remains elusive, relativistic, partial, and always incomplete it cannot be learned in totality. Truth itself is a contingent affair and assumes a different shape in the light of differing local urgencies and convictions associated with them (Fish 207). Critical knowledge has no choice solely to exercise complicity with the cultural historical mise en scene in which it is hopelessly mired. As Lee Patterson states, Even scholars who are traffic wit h chronologically and geographically contrary materials are in fact examining a cultural matrix inside which they themselves stand, and the understandings at which they arrive are influenced not simply by modern-day interests but by the shaping gone that they are engaged in recovering (259). Postmodern literary upbraiding asserts that art, author, and audience can except be approached through a serial publication of mediating contexts. Novels, poems, and plays are neither unaltered nor transcendent (Jehlen 264). Even questions of formula mustiness be considered within a such contexts. Literature is not moreover a question of what we read but of who reads and who writes, and in what social circumstances...The canon itself is an historical event it belongs to the level of the school (Guillory 238,44).Literature - Postmodern Literary Criticism Literature Essays Literary CriticismPostmodern Literary Criticism Postmodernism attempts to call into question or challenge the notion of a single absolute unified master narrative without simply replacing it with another. It is a paradoxical, recursive, and problematic method of critique. It encourages transcendence through or in spite of limitation, while simultaneously decentering the concept of absolute transcendence. To this end, it encourages the development of a heightened sense of self in relation to itself and the world around it. Postmodernism assumes an ontology of fragmented being. Where modernism asserts the primacy of the subject in revealing universal truth, postmodernism challenges the authority of the subject and, thus, universal truth based on it. Modernism and postmodernism, however, draw upon distinctly different epistemological modes critical and dogmatic. Modernism posits itself as a source of dogmatic knowledge. Dogmatic knowledge is an unchanging, absolute ideology. It has found the Truth or believes it is possible to acquire it. Knowledge is objective, tangible and quantifiable . The dogmatic mode attempts to subordinate further critical thinking in order to spread knowledge of Truth. Postmodernism, on the other hand, aspires to reflect the critical. Critical knowledge is a process, rather than product. Absolute knowledge is unattainable, conditional, and provisional at best. Any unequivocal sense of the real is rendered superfluous. Truth, therefore, remains elusive, relativistic, partial, and always incomplete it cannot be learned in totality. Truth itself is a contingent affair and assumes a different shape in the light of differing local urgencies and convictions associated with them (Fish 207). Critical knowledge has no choice but to exercise complicity with the cultural historical context in which it is hopelessly mired. As Lee Patterson states, Even scholars who are dealing with chronologically and geographically distant materials are in fact examining a cultural matrix within which they themselves stand, and the understandings at which they arriv e are influenced not simply by contemporary interests but by the shaping past that they are engaged in recovering (259). Postmodern literary criticism asserts that art, author, and audience can only be approached through a series of mediating contexts. Novels, poems, and plays are neither timeless nor transcendent (Jehlen 264). Even questions of canon must be considered within a such contexts. Literature is not only a question of what we read but of who reads and who writes, and in what social circumstances...The canon itself is an historical event it belongs to the history of the school (Guillory 238,44).